Legal Opinion

Whitman v. Riddell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1984No. 2752PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court committed reversible error in allowing appellee to admit (1) evidence of 36 accidents and (2) correspondence between appellant and the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. We agree that admitting evidence of the accidents was prejudicial error and, accordingly, reverse and remand for a new trial. We find no merit, however, in appellant’s remaining contention.

This personal injury action arose from a June 6, 1978 accident in which the automobile driven by appellee’s decedent collided with another automobile at the intersection of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Anderson v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Carney v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Yoffee v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Majdic v. Cincinnati MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Spino v. John S. Tilley Ladder Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Whyte v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Gunn v. GrossmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API