Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, J.:
¶ 1 In these consolidated appeals we must determine whether the trial court properly granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict (“J.N.O.V.”) in favor of Appellee, St. Paul Companies, Inc. (“St. Paul”), where the jury found sufficient evidence that St. Paul had acted in bad faith in refusing to negotiate and settle a medical malpractice suit brought by a third party against its insured, Birth Center. We must also decide whether compensatory damages may be available to the insured in this context where the insurer ultimately pays the excess verdict in the. underlying third-party…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Ratti v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Mishoe v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Gillard v. AIG InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.