Sinclair Coal Co. v. Pittsburgh & Ashland Coal & Dock Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Plaintiff is a wholesale coal merchant at Kansas City. Defendant is a coal jobber in Minneapolis. Plaintiff sued to recover $2,720.48, balance on an account, which defendant conceded, but alleged a counterclaim of $4,533.34. The court sustained the coun terclaim, and the difference, interest and expenses went into. the judgment.
Plaintiff furnished coal to defendant and claims the transaction was a sale. Defendant claims to have been plaintiff’s agent handling the coal on commission. Some of the coal shipped was subjected to demurrage which defendant paid in the aggregate sum of $4,533.34. If…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sutton v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Veltum v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Martin v. FeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Louis DeGidio Oil & Gas Burner Sales & Service, Inc. v. Ace Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Lyman Lumber Coal Co. v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Hollandale Marketing Ass'n v. GoematSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929