Legal Opinion

Martin v. Fee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 14, 1929No. 27,408PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The defendant Webster Lumber Company appeals from an order denying its motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial; The defendants Eklund Brothers defaulted;

The action was for breach of contract. When the evidence closed each party moved for a directed verdict, it having been previously agreed that if plaintiffs prevailed the verdict should be for $14,-972.82, with interest from May 2, 1927. Plaintiffs’ motion was granted and appellant’s was denied.

The main controversy is upon the construction of the contract in so far as thereby obligations were assumed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Grant v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. FreeburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Robinson v. HagenkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Sinclair Coal Co. v. Pittsburgh & Ashland Coal & Dock Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Wagner v. Wheeler-Barnes CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API