Legal Opinion
United States v. Baynes
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 11, 1982No. 81-1620PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
In United States v. Baynes (Appeal of Trice), 622 F.2d 66 (3d Cir. 1980), this Court ordered that an evidentiary hearing be held with respect to the habeas petition brought by Gregory Trice, who claimed he had not received the effective assistance of counsel at his trial. On remand, after conducting such a hearing, the district court determined that Trice’s constitutional right to effective assistance had been infringed, but held that no prejudice resulted to the petitioner therefrom. We agree that Trice’s sixth amendment rights were violated by his…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Zepp, Jo-Ann. Appeal of Jo Ann ZeppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Siers, Charles E. v. Ryan, Joseph M. And the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- State v. CoruzziNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.