Legal Opinion

Siers, Charles E. v. Ryan, Joseph M. And the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 20, 1985No. 84-1521PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a pro se habeas corpus petition for failure to allege facts which, if proved, would establish a constitutional violation as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a) (1982). 1 For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

Petitioner-appellant, Charles E. Siers (“Siers”) was arrested and charged with the commission of three bank robberies and, following a preliminary hearing, was bound over for trial in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County. Siers did not go…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. United States v. Lin M. RomanoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Cary R. Ortberg v. Russel Moody, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. JenningsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. George Jones M-2329 v. Charles ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API