Legal Opinion
In Re Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Derivative Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 8, 1990No. 89 Civ. 5742 (RPP)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT P. PATTERSON, Jr., District Judge.
This is a shareholder derivative action brought on behalf of Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“Par”) against certain directors, officers and former officers of Par alleging violations of Sections 14 and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78n and § 78t, and of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68, and alleging intentional and negligent breach of fiduciary duty under state law. Based on Rule 23.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Par has moved to dismiss the complaint…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Spiegel v. BuntrockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stoner v. WalshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Einhorn v. CuleaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Cutshall v. BarkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Drilling v. BermanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Brinckerhoff v. JAC Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.