Legal Opinion
Cutshall v. Barker
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 21, 2000No. 49A04-9908-CV-388PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge
Case Summary
Dr. William D. Cutshall (“William”) and his wife, Nancy (collectively, “the Cuts-halls”) appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing both their shareholder’s derivative action against Wayne Distributing, Inc. (“Wayne”), Ted A. Barker (“Barker”), Dean F. Cutshall, Jr. (“Dean”), Arthur Garringer (“Garringer”), Edward T. Rice (“Rice”), Amy Barker (“Amy”), and Stacey Barker (“Stacey”), and their direct action against Barker, Dean, Garringer, Rice, Amy and Stacey (collectively, “the Individual Defendants”). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Issues
The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Auerbach v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- In Re Perrigo CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Barth v. BarthIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Clark v. CroweIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- TP Orthodontics, Inc. v. KeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Thomas Rosenbaum v. Beau WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Marcuccilli v. Ken Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Greg Allen Const. Co., Inc. v. EstelleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.