Legal Opinion

Hoekman v. Iowa Civil Tp.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1911PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Douglas County; Hon. R. B. Tripp, Judge. Action by Herman Hoekman and others against Iowa Civil Township and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOY, J.

In this case defendants demurred to plaintiffs’ complaint on the grounds (i) that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against defendants, or either of them; (2) that there is a defect of parties plaintiff; (3) that several causes of action have been improperly united in this: That the plaintiffs are- not in any way jointly interested in this cause of action; that their interests are wholly several. The demurrer was overruled and exception taken, and such ruling of the court now assigned as error.

The complaint demurred to is as follows: That plaintiffs and each…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Randall v. Burk TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Mock v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Climer v. WallaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
  4. State ex rel. Adkins v. LienSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Schilling v. MenzieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Titus v. ChapmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Velasquez v. CoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Williams v. KlemmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Cranak v. LinkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Byrne v. McKeachieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API