Legal Opinion

Velasquez v. Cox

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1946No. 4982PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSPETH, Justice.

This is an action brought against Dee W. Cox, hereinafter called the defendant, by the plaintiffs to recover a certain described tract of real estate containing about 40 acres in Section 13, Township 30 North, Range 8 West, N.M.P.M., in San Juan County. The issues were made up by the defendant’s amended answer to the complaint, a cross-complaint and plaintiffs’ reply. The case was tried by the court, without a jury, and the defendant recovered judgment, from which an appeal had been taken to this court.

The court found that the plaintiffs were the owners of the W% of the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cragin v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  3. Lovelace v. HightowerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Roberts v. BraeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Thurmond v. EspalinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sachs v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Sproles v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State Ex Rel. King v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. PartnershipNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Murray Hotel Co. v. GoldingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Woodburn v. GrimesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API