Legal Opinion

Dockery v. Hocutt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 2003No. 609A02PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Justice.

Plaintiffs Lewis D. Dockery (plaintiff) and James L. Gunter instituted this civil action claiming title to certain lands by adverse possession. Plaintiff Gunter resolved his dispute with defendants and is no longer a party to this litigation. The determinative issues before’ this Court are whether the Court of Appeals properly affirmed the trial court’s compulsory reference of the case to a referee and whether the Court of Appeals properly affirmed the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s request for jury trial after an adverse determination by the referee. For the reasons…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Roumillat v. Simplistic Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Nelson v. FreelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Brown v. FloweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Minor v. MinorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Jernigan v. HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Burton v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Mitchell, Brewer, Richardson, Adams, Burge & Boughman v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API