Legal Opinion

&198tna Life Ins. Co. v. Norfleet

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 25, 1936No. 6 Div. 942PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

While there was a conflict in the evidence between the defendant’s agent, Vaughn, and the plaintiff’s witness, Mrs. Heck, as to what was said between the insured and said agent when the application was taken, and a good part of the appellee’s brief is devoted to this phase of the case, the appellant does not rest its appeal on or insist upon the defense of a false statement by the insured in the procurement of the policy.

Quoting from appellant’s brief: “We, therefore, stand or fall in this court upon the defense that the insured breached that stipulation in the policy…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia v. NewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Harris v. Nashville C. & St. Louis R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. ZivitzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. TrammellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Grabove v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Pollard v. TreadwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API