Legal Opinion

Grabove v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 27, 1941No. 6 Div. 822PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The action was for sick benefits under a life, accident, and health policy of insurance.

The sole question here for review is the ruling of the trial court on motion for new trial, holding defendant entitled to the affirmative charge, with hypothesis.

The “Insuring Clause” of the policy insured “against loss of time, beginning while this policy is in force and resulting from disease contracted during any term of this policy * * * subject, however, to all the provisions and limitations hereinafter contained.”

Under “Additional Provisions,” appears the following: “This policy does…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Robinson v. CrotwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. New York Life Ins. v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Odom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American Life Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. National Security Insurance Co. of Elba v. TellisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Provident Life Acc. Ins. Co. v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  5. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. RowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API