Miller v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
Suit on a policy of insurance. Some of the rulings in favor of the special pleas were erroneous, but that, in our opinion, is not now a matter of consequence. All that can be said against special plea numbered 3 is that it fails to allege explicitly that the complaint with, which plaintiff (appellant) had suffered prior to his application for the policy in suit, in which he represented that his health was good, whereas he was suffering from cancer, was intrinsically material to the risk; but no doubt we know that a person afflicted with cancer does not enjoy good health, and that such disease…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Independent Life Ins. Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- National Life and Accident Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Independent Life Ins. Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.