Pollard v. Treadwell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The respective counsel agree as to the effect of the pleading and the substantial effect of the evidence.
The sufficiency of the counts are not challenged by the appellant. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Wilson, 215 Ala. 612, 111 So. 901.
The property destroyed by fire was a metal covered barn, one end of which was open and with cracks and exposures in its side walls. The barn was filled with hay at the- time it was destroyed by fire.
The fact that the engine passed plaintiff’s barn, emitting smoke and cinders of large and unusual size and .number, and that a short time thereafter…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marbury Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. HarmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ReeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Police & Firemen's Ins. Ass'n v. MullinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Union Central Life Insurance Company v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- American Life Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Cooper v. Providence HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.