Legal Opinion
Farrar v. Mayabb
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 12, 1959No. 7756PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUARK, Judge.
The question in this case is whether or not an automobile liability policy was can-celled.
Horatio M. Farrar, administrator of the estate of Claire Lynne Farrar, obtained a judgment against Lloyd Mayabb for damages suffered in an automobile collision. 1 Thereafter the administrator garnisheed the appellant, Phoenix Assurance Company of New York, and obtained judgment below.
The facts concerning the insurance policy are as follows: On July 12, 1954, a Mrs. Jones operated an insurance agency and brokerage business in Springfield known as the “Glenn W. Jones Agency.” 2 Lloyd Mayabb,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Newco Land Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Tarleton v. De VeuveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Sterling Fire Insurance v. Comision Reguladora Del Mercado De HenequenIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. MayabbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Langdon v. KleemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Schimmel Fur Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Cat'N Fiddle, Inc. v. Century Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Berger v. McBride & Son Builders, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- First National Bank of Independence v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Stone & Sons, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.