Legal Opinion
Home Insurance Co. v. Southern Motor Coach Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 12, 1935No. 23777PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
This is an appeal from the district court of Pontotoc county. Plaintiff in error, the Home Insurance Company, a corporation, was defendant in the trial court, and the defendant in error, Southern Motor Coach Corporation, was plaintiff. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff brought suit to recover upon a fire insurance policy for a fire loss on one of its motor busses.
The Ebey-MeCauley Company, of Ada, was a policy writing agent for the defendant, and for various other fire insurance companies. Mr. Ebey of that firm handled the transactions material here.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Ramspeck v. PattilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Empire State Insurance v. American Central InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- E.S. Ins. Co. v. . A.C. Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- &198tna Ins. Co. v. RicheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. BurdineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Markel Service, Inc. v. National Farm LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Robert L. Bailey v. Gulf Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. HeardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- In Re Cooper Mfg. Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.