Legal Opinion
Mutchka v. Harris
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 8, 2005No. SACV0534JVSANXPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order re Motion to Dismiss
SELNA, District Judge.
Defendants have filed the instant motion to dismiss Charles Mutchka and Pauline Mutchka’s (collectively, “the Mutchkas”) Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in full.
I. BACKGROUND
The Mutchkas have filed this action, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, against the advisors, trustees, and affiliates of the Alianz Family of Mutual Funds (collectively, “Defendants”). 1 The Complaint asserts that Defendants failed to ensure that the PIMCO funds participated in securities class actions for which they…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Northstar Financial Advisors, Inc. v. Schwab InvestmentsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Stegall v. LadnerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Siegel v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Danielle Santomenno v. John Hancock Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- In Re Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.