Legal Opinion
Danielle Santomenno v. John Hancock Life Insurance Co
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 16, 2012No. 11-2520PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
VANASKIE, Circuit Judge.
Danielle Santomenno, Karen Poley, and Barbara Poley (collectively, “Participants”) brought suit against John Hancock Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) and its affiliates (collectively, “John Hancock”) under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., and the Investment Company Act of 1940 (ICA), 15 U.S.C. § 80a-l et seq., for allegedly charging their retirement plans excessive fees on annuity insurance contracts offered to plan participants. The District Court granted John Hancock’s motion to dismiss. It…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- California v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Albert Flora, Jr. v. County of LuzerneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Wendell Brown v. PoormanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Santomenno Ex Rel. John Hancock Trust v. John Hancock Life Insurance Co. (U.S.A)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Laborers' Local 265 Pension Fund v. iShares TrustCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Ufcw Local 1500 Pension Fund v. Marissa MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.