In Re Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Fee Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
This document relates to: All Actions.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs have moved to alter or amend the judgment dismissing this action and for reconsideration of this Court’s August 1, 2005 Opinion and Order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss each of the ten counts alleged in the Second Amended Complaint and denying the plaintiffs leave to amend. See In re Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Fee Litig., 380 F.Supp.2d 222 (S.D.N.Y.2005). The plaintiffs also move for leave to file a third amended complaint.
I
The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), filed on August 26, 2004 on behalf of a purported class of persons or…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Jackson v. Birmingham Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, Inc., and Charles H. Dowd, Stuart A. Wixson, George J. Springer, C. H. Donohue and Crown Finance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bellikoff v. Eaton Vance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- In Re Salomon Smith Barney Mutual Fund Fees LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In re Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Smith v. Manhattan Club Timeshare Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Nesbitt Bellevue Property LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.