Menzel Estate Co. v. City of Redding
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Shasta County. James G. Estep, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. C. H. Braynard, City Attorney of the City of Redding, Braynard & Kimball, and W. D. Tillotson, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment for $3,750 for the detriment caused to the property of plaintiffs in a ferry franchise and equipment by the construction of a free bridge over the Sacramento Biver connecting a street in the city of Bedding with a county road of the county of Shasta. As originally commenced the action was one by which the plaintiffs sought to enjoin the city from completing the bridge. At the time of the trial it was all constructed except the north approach, and the court believing that all the detriment caused by the erection of the bridge might be compensated by damages,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gardella v. County of AmadorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Vallejo Ferry Co. v. Solano Aquatic ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Norris v. Farmers' & Teamsters' Co.California Supreme Court · 1856
- People v. San Francisco & Alameda R.R.California Supreme Court · 1868
- Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Citizens' Traction Co. of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stockton v. Department of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Larson v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Monarch Cablevision, Inc. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Riss & Company v. Association of American RailroadsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
- Yosemite Park & Curry Co. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.