Legal Opinion

Toms v. Boyes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Ottawa. (Arnold, J.) Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The bill in this case is filed to compel a release or quit-claim, from defendants, of certain lands described in a mortgage dated August 1,1867, made by defendant Boyes to A._D. Griswold, to secure the payment of $510, with interest at ten percent., claimed to be due for the purchase price of said land, or to declare a first lien thereon and a sale thereof to satisfy such lien.

The mortgage was duly assigned in November, 1867, by Griswold to George Jerome, and by him, in July, 1869, to Robert P. Toms. The mortgage and assignments were duly *388recorded, shortly after their respective dates, in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowes v. HaywoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Griswold v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Fenn v. KinseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Haney v. RoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Webster v. NewellMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Northern Michigan Building & Loan Ass'n v. ForsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Link v. Diamond Crystal Salt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Huggett v. CaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API