Legal Opinion
Haney v. Roy
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Muskegon. (Russell, J.) Foreclosure bill. Complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
We find the facts so well stated in the brief ■of complainants that we adopt them in this opinion:
“ On the 9th day of September, 1867, Augustus D. Griswold and wife conveyed by warranty deed to Mary A. Haney the N. E. ¼ of the S. E. ¼ of section 9, in town 9 N., of range 16 W. Mary A. Haney conveyed the same premises by warranty deed to Hiram H. Haney, on the 12th day of January, 1869, who soon thereafter went into possession of .and cultivated the same and built a house thereon, in which he resided with his family until he sold and conveyed the :said premises to the defendant, David M. Roy,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hitchcock v. FortierIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Massey v. PapinSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Bowes v. HaywoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Tefft v. MunsonNew York Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by4 opinions
- Duffy v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Moyle v. Congregational Society of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- Personal Finance Co. v. Henley-Kimball Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938
- Toms v. BoyesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886