Legal Opinion

Huggett v. Case

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1886Published

Appeal from Eaton. (Hooker, J.)' Bill filed to compel conveyance of defendant’s apparent title to land. Defendants Case appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Complainants filed their bill of complaint to compel defendants to-release and convey to them all right, title, and interest which they have, or claim to have, in the S. -£• of S. E.' ¿ of section 7, in township 4 N., range 6 W., in' the county of Eaton.

Complainants claim to be the equitable owners of the legal estate, derived through mesne conveyances from one Jonas Ashley, who located a quarter section of land, including that in controversy,' on a military bounty land-warrant of 1850, numbered 12,501, issued to him by the United States. The location was mad.e on June 14, 1852.

April 3, 1853,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dale v. TurnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Toms v. BoyesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API