Legal Opinion
Link v. Diamond Crystal Salt Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1924No. Docket No. 59PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The issues involved in this litigation are so clearly stated by the trial judge that we quote his opinion as follows:
“It is agreed that the above suits be tried together. In the first case plaintiff seeks the specific performance, as contract purchaser of a contract for the sale of lot 17, Oakland Grove subdivision of a part of the city of _SL Clair. In its answer defendant denies that plaintiff is entitled to specific performance of the contract for lot 17 unless he pays for other lots in this plat which he has contracted to purchase and pays for the house which it has built for plaintiff on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goodenow v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Solomon v. ShewitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Hager v. ReyMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Miller v. CornwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Wolff v. Alpena National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Snider v. SchafferMichigan Supreme Court · 1936