Legal Opinion

State v. G. A. K.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 2016No. 15CC01028; A159080PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SERCOMBE, R J.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her to the custody of the Mental Health Division based on a finding that, because of a mental disorder, appellant was dangerous to others. See ORS 426.005(l)(f); ORS 426.130. Appellant contends that the state failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that she presented a danger to others. As explained below, we agree and, accordingly, reverse.

We state the facts consistently with the trial court’s findings. However, as explained in more detail below, the trial court failed to address or make a finding regarding one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. D. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. E.D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. In Re the Marriage of FrostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. S.F. (In re S.F.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. J. P. (In re J. P.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. J. T. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API