Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. J. T. C.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 1, 2017No. 140160850; A156283Published

1DissentEgan, J.

I agree with the majority opinion’s conclusion that the evidence in this record is insufficient to support commitment on a “basic needs” theory. I disagree, however, with its conclusion that the record is legally sufficient to support the trial court’s determination that, because of his mental disorder, appellant is a danger to others. Accordingly, I would reverse the judgment committing appellant to the Oregon Health Authority and I dissent from the majority’s contrary conclusion.

The majority has correctly stated the general legal principles that govern our review in civil commitment cases,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. D. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. L. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. E.D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. G. A. K.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API