Legal Opinion
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5683, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9718 Clinton W. Love, Sr. And Rose Mary Love, Husband and Wife v. United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 21, 1995No. 94-35346PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.
Clinton and Rose Mary Love brought suit against the United States and various federal agents seeking damages resulting from the manner in which their farm equipment and livestock were foreclosed upon by the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA). The Loves asserted claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80. The district court granted summary judgment on the Bivens claim, holding that the federal agents were…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Art metal-u.s.a., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Andrew Chen and Chen Printing and Supply Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Wade Baker and Rita Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jachetta v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Delta Savings Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Delta Savings Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Tommy J. Eaton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Dettling v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.