Legal Opinion
Eastman Kodak Company v. Home Utilities Company
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 14, 1956No. Civ. 8379PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
R. DORSEY WATKINS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Eastman Kodak Company (Eastman), a New Jersey corporation, sued Home Utilities Company, Incorporated (Home Utilities), a Maryland corporation, for violation of the Maryland Fair Trade Act, Annotated Code of Maryland, 1951 Edition, Article 83, §§ 102-110. In addition to the jurisdictional allegations as to diversity of citizenship (which was admitted), and amount in controversy in excess of $3,-000 (which was proved), the complaint alleged that plaintiff was engaged in the business of manufacturing cameras, films and other photographic supply items,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ruhlin v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bourjois Sales Corp. v. DorfmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Goldsmith v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- General Electric Company v. Hess Brothers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Norman's on the Waterfront, Inc. v. WheatleyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1970
- Bissell Carpet Sweeper Co. v. Masters Mail Order Co. of Washington, D. C., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- Shulton, Inc. v. Consumer Value Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Gadol v. Dart Drug Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.