Legal Opinion

Britton v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 9, 2009No. 08AB2237; A140641Published

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Claimant seeks review of an Employment Appeals Board (EAB) order denying her claim for unemployment benefits on the ground that she was discharged for misconduct. ORS 657.176(2)(a). She assigns error to the EAB’s factual findings. We review the EAB’s factual findings for substantial evidence. ORS 183.482(8); Confederated Tribes (Siletz) v. Employment Dept., 165 Or App 65, 68, 995 P2d 580 (2000). We affirm.

The EAB made the following factual findings:

“(1) Oregon Halfway House, Inc. [employer] employed claimant as a case manager from November 29, 2004 to August 19, 2008.
“(2) The employer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Freeman v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Jordan v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. Halling v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API