Boskovich v. Midvale City Corp.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice.
Appeal from a no cause of action judgment. Plaintiffs sought an injunction and damages against defendants, where a portion of a street and alley was closed by city ordinance. The judgment is reversed and remanded, with costs on appeal to plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs own lots in Eastvale Addition, a platted, recorded and accepted subdivision in Midvale. The street and alley in question are included therein, and the shaded area of the subjoined sketch represents the closed portion.
*447Without notice to, application by, or hearing of any kind afforded any property owner, Midvale’s council…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sowadzki v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Wall v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1917
- Robinett v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Tuttle v. SowadzkiUtah Supreme Court · 1912
- Hall v. North Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carrier v. LindquistUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Sears v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Potter v. South Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Anderson v. Granite School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1966
- Nelson v. Provo CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.