Legal Opinion

Boskovich v. Midvale City Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1952No. 7756PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from a no cause of action judgment. Plaintiffs sought an injunction and damages against defendants, where a portion of a street and alley was closed by city ordinance. The judgment is reversed and remanded, with costs on appeal to plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs own lots in Eastvale Addition, a platted, recorded and accepted subdivision in Midvale. The street and alley in question are included therein, and the shaded area of the subjoined sketch represents the closed portion.

*447Without notice to, application by, or hearing of any kind afforded any property owner, Midvale’s council…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sowadzki v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wall v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Robinett v. PriceUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Tuttle v. SowadzkiUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Hall v. North Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carrier v. LindquistUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sears v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Potter v. South Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Anderson v. Granite School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Nelson v. Provo CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API