Legal Opinion

Potter v. South Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2018No. Case No. 20150931PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Associate Chief Justice Lee, opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 Jeanette Potter and others filed suit challenging a decision of the South Salt Lake City Council to close a portion of Truman and Burton Avenues. The district court dismissed Potter's claims on summary judgment. We affirm. In so doing we conclude that the petition to vacate was valid under Utah Code section 10-9a-609.5, that Potter has not identified any prejudice resulting from any alleged deficiency in the petition, and that notice of the city council meetings was sufficient under Utah Code section 10-9a-208.

¶ 2 In holding that Potter…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Olsen v. Eagle Mountain CityUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In Re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nassi v. HatsisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  2. Downham v. ArbuckleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. Salt Lake City v. KunzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. Westgate Resorts, Ltd. v. AdelUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Meinhard v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API