Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fitton and Pittman, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 26, 1975No. 19979PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This case involves the negligence of the defendant-appellant in failing to refill a utility pole hole and the propriety of a jury award of Twenty-five Thousand ($25,000.00) Dollars actual damages.

On September 26, 1969, the appellant pursuant to a contract with Southern Bell Telephone Company replaced a telephone pole located on property used by Charles Campbell for a combination automotive repair garage and used car lot. The old pole was removed, but admittedly appellant did not refill the remaining hole. The hole was located about one foot from a fence which enclosed the used…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  2. Matthews v. PorterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Rogers v. ScyphersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  4. Edward's of Byrnes Downs v. Charleston Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  5. Clyde v. SumerelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lucht Ex Rel. Estate of Lucht v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Dorrell v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. King v. Daniel International CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. Walters v. Tire Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Sessions v. Dickerson, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API