Walters v. Tire Sales & Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
At the outset, we note that the act of alleged negligence which the plaintiffs contend caused damage to their truck occurred in North Carolina. The accident occurred in South Carolina. South Carolina law governs as to whether the defendant is liable for the alleged negligence. See Chewning v. Chewning, 20 N.C. App. 283, 201 S.E. 2d 353 (1973). We believe the law of South Carolina governing liability for negligence is the same as the law of this state so far as the issues are concerned in the case sub índice. See Mahaffey v. Ahl, 264 S.C. 241, 214 S.E. 2d 119 (1975) and Smith v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mann v. VIRGINIA DARE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Mahaffey v. AhlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Smith v. Fitton and Pittman, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Chewning v. ChewningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
3Cited by5 opinions
- Largent v. AcuffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Barbecue Inn, Inc. v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Corda v. Brook Valley Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- McLaughlin v. Michelin Tire Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- McLaughlin v. Michelin Tire Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989