Legal Opinion

Connor v. Hauch

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 3, 1981No. 161, September Term, 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

In this appeal from a summary judgment granted by the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, appellants contend principally that the workmen’s compensation statute of Delaware should not bar a personal injury action against their fellow employee in Maryland under the doctrine of lex loci delicti. Maryland permits such suits between co-employees subject to workmen’s compensation, Md. Ann. Code, Art. 101 (1957, 1979 Repl. Vol., 1981 Cum. Supp.), 1 but Delaware does not, 19 Del. Code §§ 2304 and 2363(a) (1977 Repl. Vol.), Groves v. Marvel, 213 A.2d 853 (Del.1965). For the reasons stated, we hold…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Feitig v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  3. White v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Wilson v. FaullSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  5. Hutzell v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hauch v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. In Re Air Crash Disaster at Washington, D.C. on January 13, 1982District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  3. Hastings v. MechalskeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Athas v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Powell v. ErbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API