Legal Opinion
Hutzell v. Boyer
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 23, 1969No. [No. 23, September Term, 1968.]PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.
In 1963 plaintiff-appellee, Robert E. Boyer and defendant-appellant, Claude M. Hutzell, had been working on various paving construction jobs in the Fredericksburg, Virginia area. During that year the superintendent of paving for the General Paving Corporation, Mr. Robert Cole, offered both men jobs with his company. General Paving is a Virginia corporation engaged in the laying of asphalt roads and driveways in the Fairfax, Virginia area. The offer included higher wages and free transportation furnished by the company to and from work each day. Both plaintiff, Boyer and defendant, Hutzell,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- White v. KingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Adams v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Hauch v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Cunningham v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Walston v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Laboratory Corp. of America v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Nolan v. DillonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.