Legal Opinion

State v. Squires

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 21, 1992No. 23765PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

We are asked to decide whether infrared spectroscopy constitutes a “chemical test” as contemplated by the implied consent statute, S.C. Code Ann. § 56-5-2950 (1991). We conclude that it does, and, in so doing, affirm appellant Linda Sue Squires’s conviction for driving under the influence.

I. FACTS

Early in the morning of December 1, 1991, a highway patrolman observed Squires driving erratically on a public roadway. He stopped Squires and asked her to perform a field sobriety test. After Squires failed the test, the highway patrolman placed her under arrest for driving…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Browning Ex Rel. Estate of Browning v. HartvigsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Fisher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. City of Dayton v. SchenckCity of Dayton Municipal Court · 1980
  5. State v. NicholsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BakerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. HuntleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Lemond v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  4. Grazia v. South Carolina State Plastering, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Grazia v. South Carolina State Plastering, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API