Legal Opinion

State v. Nichols

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1986No. 15860PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This appeal presents three issues: (1) Does the repeal of a penal statute, when accompanied by enactment of a modified statute, terminate a pending prosecution under the old statute? (2) Does the speedy trial provision of I.C. § 19-3501, as it existed in 1983, apply to a misdemeanor case? (3) Does Idaho’s “implied consent” law, which at times pertinent to this case required motorists to take “chemical” tests of their blood-alcohol content, authorize a test using infrared light energy rather than chemicals? These issues are raised by Edwin Nichols, who stands convicted in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sekt v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. Jones, New York County Courts1983
  3. Ellenwood v. CramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. MooreSuperior Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HartwigIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. State v. CreaIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. YoungHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Lemond v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
  5. State v. FlaggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API