Grazia v. South Carolina State Plastering, LLC
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*566Justice HEARN.
Anthony and Barbara Grazia appeal the circuit court’s grant of a motion to strike class allegations from their complaint. The Grazias contend the circuit court erred in finding the Notice and Opportunity to Cure Construction Dwelling Defect Act is in conflict with the State’s class action lawsuit jurisprudence under Rule 23, SCRCP. We agree and reverse.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This action involves the alleged negligent and defective construction of residential homes in a subdivision in Bluffton, South Carolina. The Grazias brought a class action on behalf of themselves and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- TNS Mills, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Feldman v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Eagle Container Co., LLC v. County of NewberrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Melton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- Thornton v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Corp. (SCE & G)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Brooks v. GAF Materials Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.