Legal Opinion

State v. Baker

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 1993No. 23814PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

Appellant Ernest Eugene Baker was convicted of driving under the influence (DUI), second offense. He contends, among other things, that the State should have been precluded from prosecuting his case because it failed to offer him a breath test when he was arrested. We disagree and affirm.

I. FACTS

The evening of October 28, 1989, Baker was involved in a collision with another automobile on 1-26 near St. Andrews Road in Columbia. Baker’s car flipped over, pinning him inside, unconscious. He was extracted by emergency personnel and taken to Lexington Memorial Hospital for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Browning Ex Rel. Estate of Browning v. HartvigsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Murphy v. HaganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. People v. CulpSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. State v. BarrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. State v. SquiresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Roche v. Young Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. ElwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. Busby v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. Peake v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API