Universal Sportswear, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LARAMORE, Judge.
This action is brought by plaintiff to recover extra costs as a result of additional work required under an amendment to the contract.
Both the plaintiff and defendant have filed motions for summary judgment, and the following facts are presented by the pleadings, affidavits, and exhibits filed:
On or about March 14, 1952, plaintiff, a New York corporation, entered into a contract with the Navy for the manufacture of approximately 9,400 wool raincoats with removable rayon cloth linings. The contract provided that the defendant was to supply the wool outer cloth and the plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Curtis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Electric Fireproofing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1904
3Cited by10 opinions
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Maxwell Dynamometer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Urban Plumbing & Heating Co., an Oregon Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Universal Ecsco Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.