Legal Opinion
International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 22, 1975No. 230-72PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKtjnzig, Judge
This is a contract action wherein this court, by cross motions for summary judgment, has been asked to review a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the Board)1 in accordance with the standards of the Wun-derlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321,322 (1970).
In issue is whether the Board’s decision that the Government was entitled to terminate plaintiff’s preproduction model contract2 for default is supported by substantial evidence and is correct as a matter of law.
We hold that plaintiff’s contract was terminated for the convenience of the Government and, therefore, reverse the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Foster Construction C. A. And Williams Brothers Company, a Joint Venture, Etc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Maxwell Dynamometer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Johnson, Drake & Piper, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Alfred R. Chouinard, II and Ginger Leigh Chouinard v. Alfred F. ChouinardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation, and General Dynamics Corporation v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Roskos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Olson Plumbing & Heating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.