Legal Opinion
Ajit K. Medhekar v. United States District Court For The Northern District Of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 31, 1996No. 96-70437PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
99 F.3d 325
65 USLW 2316, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,337,
36 Fed.R.Serv.3d 321,
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7966,
96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,219
Ajit K. MEDHEKAR; Sid Agrawal; C.N. Reddy; C.N. Reddy
Investments, Inc.; N. Damodar Reddy; N.D.R.
Investments, Inc.; Ronald K. Shelton;
Alliance Semiconductor Corp.,
Petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, Respondent,
and
Robert Hockey, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, Real Party in Interest.
No. 96-70437.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted by Telephone
to Motions Panel Oct. 1,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Blackburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Admiral Insurance Company v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Medhekar v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Hockey v. MedhekarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Faulkner v. Verizon Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Ravens v. IftikarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
- In Re Lernout & Hauspie Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Universal Trading & Investment Co. v. Dugsbery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.