Legal Opinion

Universal Trading & Investment Co. v. Dugsbery, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 20, 2012No. 11-16132UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Universal Trading & Investment Co. (“UTICo”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its action, 1 and the ensuing judgment, 2 against Pavlo Lazarenko, and entities purportedly under his control. 3 We affirm.

The issues before us center on whether the California statute of limitations bars UTICo’s claim that it can sue Lazarenko on the basis that he is indebted to United Energy Systems of the Ukraine (“UESU”), which is the judgment debtor of UTICo. See Cal.Civ.Proc.Code §§ 708.210, 708.230.(1) UTICo first argues that the district court erred because it did not accept the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Ernest S. Little v. City of Seattle John Doe Jane Doe, and David PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
City Of Los Angeles, Harbor Division, A Municipal Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant v. Santa Monica BaykeeperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Sanford v. Smith CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2015