Tvedt v. Haugen
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChristianson, J.
This is an action for damages for alleged malpractice of a physician. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment was entered pursuant to the verdict, and the defendant has appealed from such judgment.
The only question raised on the appeal is as to the sufficiency of the evidence. In the court below the defendant challenged the sufficiency of the evidence by motions to dismiss the action and for a directed verdict. The challenge is renewed here by appropriate assignments of error, supported by argument.
In determining the question of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hedin v. Minneapolis Medical & Surgical InstituteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- State Ex Rel. Workmen's Compensation Fund v. Yellow Cab Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Whitson v. HillisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Beardsley v. EwingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by29 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Shilkret v. Annapolis Emergency Hospital Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.