Legal Opinion

Whitson v. Hillis

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1927PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdzell, Ch. J.

This is an action to recover damages for alleged malpractice. In the trial court the plaintiff had judgment and the defendant appeals. In the complaint it is alleged that on the first day of January, 1925, the plaintiff sustained a fracture of his right leg just above the ankle joint, and the defendant was called to attend him. The charges of negligence are that in attempting to diagnose and treat the fracture the plaintiff negligently and carelessly failed to correctly diagnose and ascertain the nature of,the injury; that he diagnosed the injury as a fracture of the smaller…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Miller v. TolesMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Berkholz v. BenepeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Tady v. WartaNebraska Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Smith v. YoheSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Pilgrim v. LandhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Winkjer v. HerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wilson v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API