Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2005No. M2002-01849-SC-R11-CDPublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J„

delivered the opinion of the court,

in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ., joined.

We accepted review of this cause under the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 11, in order to address a question properly preserved and certified pursuant to the provisions of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 37(b)(2)(i). The question, as certified, is: Whether the consent given to search the defendant’s motel room is consistent with the requirements of the United States Constitution and…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. State v. DayTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. MeeksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. TalleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. BerriosTennessee Supreme Court · 2007

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API