Legal Opinion
Harrison Aire, Inc. v. Aerostar International, Inc. Raven Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 16, 2005No. 04-2904, 04-3052PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Chief Judge.
In this antitrust action, we address allegations of unlawful monopolization and tying in the aftermarket for replacement hot air balloon fabric. The District Court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, finding no triable issue of monopoly power in the relevant product market. We will affirm.
I
Harrison Aire, a hot air balloon ride operator, alleges antitrust violations by Raven Industries and its balloon-manufacturing subsidiary, Aerostar International. Consistent with our standard of review on summary judgment, we recount the facts in the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Avaya Inc. v. Telecom Labs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Authenticom, Inc. v. CDK Global, LLC (In re Dealer Mgmt. Sys. Antitrust Litig.)District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.