Legal Opinion
Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 4, 2007No. 06-4292PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents important questions regarding whether a patent holder’s deceptive conduct before a private standards-determining organization may be condemned under antitrust laws and, if so, what facts must be pled to survive a motion to dismiss. Broadcom Corporation (“Broadcom”) alleged that Qualcomm Inc. (“Qualcomm”), by its intentional deception of private standards-determining organizations and its predatory acquisition of a potential rival, has monopolized certain markets for cellular telephone technology and components, primarily in…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- SD3, LLC v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Ethypharm S.A. France v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc. v. UPMCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Lotes Co. v. Hon Hai Precision Industry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.