Legal Opinion

Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 23, 2010No. 09-3989PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COWEN, Circuit Judge.

The Plaintiff in this antitrust matter, a tire supplier, appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granting the respective motions for summary judgment filed by the Defendants, a tire supplier competitor and a motorsports sanctioning body. Plaintiffs claims arise out of the adoption of the so-called “single tire rule” by various sanctioning bodies in the sport of dirt oval track racing as well as the related exclusive supply contracts between these sanctioning bodies and the Defendant tire supplier.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. Alioto v. Town of LisbonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. ZF Meritor LLC v. Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Premier Comp Solutions LLC v. UPMCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Hospira, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  5. Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API